The Dyatlov Pass Incident

I’ve known about the Dyatlov Pass Incident for quite some time.  I first stumbled over it on’s forums about five or six years ago.  From time to time someone will mention it and I’ll have to go read about it all over again.  So, to save myself some time and to entertain anyone reading, here’s a bit of background on one of the most unusual murder mysteries in modern history.

The incident occurred on February 2, 1959, in eastern foothills of a mountain named Kholat Syakhl in Russia.  Kholat Syakhl, by the way, translates to “Mountain of Death”.  The pass where the incident occurred has subsequently been named Dyatlov Pass after the leader of the expedition that went missing on that fateful evening in 1959.

Ten hikers were involved in the incident, a tourist group on a ski hike across the northern Urals.  There were eight men, including the group leader, Igor Dyatlov, and two women, and they set out from the village of Vizhai on January 27th, bound for Otorten, another village across the mountains.  The group was made up mostly of students from Ural State Technical University, and all were accomplished skiers and mountain hikers.  The path they were taking was considered a “level III”, the most difficult, but it was well known and mapped.

Authorities eventually discovered journals and cameras which helped to fill in the period of time between the group leaving Vizhai and the establishing of a camp on the side of Kholat Syakhl.  One member of the group, the only survivor, Yuri Yudin, was forced to return to Vizhai on the 28th due to illness.  The group apparently drifted off course, most likely due to snowstorms and limited visibility, and were forced to make camp in the shadow to the mountain.

The events of the evening of February 2nd aren’t entirely clear. Unfortunately, the party wasn’t considered overdue until February 12th, and a search party wasn’t formed until family and relatives complained enough and the investigation began on February 20th.

When the camp on the mountain side was found on February 26th, the tent was in tatters, empty, and a line of footprints led down into a nearby forest.  They discovered the remains of a fire under a pine tree, and huddled around it were the first two corpses: Yuri Krivonischenko and Yuri Doroshenko.  Both men were naked save for their underwear.

The investigators found three more corpses between the tree and the camp, including that of Dyatlov himself.  They appeared to have been trying to make their way back to the tent, but each died before they reached the camp.  The remaining four hikers were not discovered for two months; on May 4th their bodies were discovered under four meters of snow in a ravine some distance away, past the pine tree.

Of the first five corpses found, only one showed any injury; one man had a small, seemingly non-fatal skull fracture.  Hypothermia was ruled as the cause of death.  The other four bodies, however, painted a much different picture.

Three of the four corpses in the ravine had fatal injuries.  One man had a severely fractured skull, and the two others had major damage to their rib-cages, crushed as if by some extreme weight.  The injuries looked, in fact, like the three had been in a car crash, though that was impossible.  There were no tracks found near the bodies other than those of the four victims, and there were no signs of a physical struggle.  In addition to having her chest caved in, Lyudmila Dubinina had also had her tongue cut out.

As the investigation continued, other strange facts came to light.  The tent, which had been badly damaged, had been torn apart from the inside.  There were no signs of anyone or anything in the vicinity, but it appeared that the hikers had rushed from the tent, most only partially dressed.  There were no signs of a struggle, and the tracks showed each hiker left the camp on their own.  Additionally, some of the corpses showed high levels of radiation when examined, far more than would be considered normal, though not at lethal levels. One investigator reported that his dosimeter had registered a spike in radiation on the mountain, but no source could be found.

The strangeness doesn’t end there.  Family and friends at the funerals claimed that the hikers all had unusually orange skin tones. Unusual scrap metal was discovered in the area, possibly the remnants of military exercises.  A number of “spheres” were reported in the area, essentially UFOs, by both meteorologists and military observers.  Additionally, the number nine seems to play a role – myths of the Mansi people claim that nine of their people died on the mountain.  Nine others were killed not far from the campsite in an airplaine crash in 1991.

In the end, no one really knows what drove the nine hikers from their tent on that lethally cold night in 1958.  Native Mansi attacks and military cover-ups seem unlikely considering the lack of any prints other than those of the hikers themselves.  What could have so frightened nine people, all experienced mountaineers, into abandoning their tent in the middle of the night, and what caused the injuries that killed three of the four people found in the ravine?  Why was one woman’s tongue cut from her mouth?  What madness gripped this party camping on the snowy slopes of the “Mountain of Death”?

Yuri Yudin would like to know.  Asked about the incident, he replied, “If I had a chance to ask God just one question, it would be, ‘What really happened to my friends that night?'”

7 thoughts on “The Dyatlov Pass Incident

Add yours

  1. A fairly accurate and brief assessment. For your own information though, your reference “the group apparently drifted off course”, while often repeated, is inaccurate. It refers to their tent being found slightly west of their planned route. However, it was to be expected that they would camp to one side or the other off the planned route to allow for firewood and shelter (The planned route was one of open skiing area.). The suggestion they were off course arose from them being on the west side of the planned route versus the east side. The east offered firewood and shelter at Hill 663 whereas the west offered the barren, open slope of Hill 1079, “The Mountain of Death”.

    This was actually the second time the Dyatlov party had deliberately drifted off course. The day before they deliberately bypassed Hill 663 for Hill 805 to save time. By this unplanned route they attempted to enter the east side of the pass, which would take them to the the shelter and firewood of Hill 611. They arrived too late to make it through though and turned back south to Hill 663 to camp for the night.

    In the morning they cached their equipment and left northwest from that cache by steering a compass course in the overcast (an absolute necessity to avoid getting lost). Steering northwest put them on the west side of the pass. Igor Dyatlov set this course for the same reason he set course for Hill 805 the day before – To save time. They had only been making one mile hour. Steering northwest took them straight to Mount Otorten. Had they steered northeast to Hill 611, while they would have reached wood and shelter, they would only have progressed four miles that day. Two of those four miles would have been away from Otorten and they would have had to ski over 200 meters uphill from Hill 611 just to get back on course.

    Rather than do this, Dyatlov cut across Hill 1079 – a decision that would kill him and everyone in his party.

    For a detailed analysis of Dyatlov’s compass course as well what killed them on the mountain (or for a just plain interesting read) see:

    “A Compelling Unknown Force” by Clark Wilkins on Amazon’s Kindle for just 99 cents.

    1. A lot of clue,s in this story of dyatlov pass,we intend to go for the simple answers like ufo,yeti and mansi tribe ,there,s so much clue,s in this mystery,we don,t add 2 and makes 4,why l miss the other 2 out,because we don,t add logic,we try to add and take away and still call it 4,this is not a conspircy,The radioactive on the outer clothes could have come from her collage,she was a student,but the fact is we are not told what Dubinina was studying , she could have been studying in a lab,remember it was the time of the cold war ,At that time in russia everything belong to the state so students was looking to go far in life the goverment would give people who went far in there academics propertys ,after they retired the property would be taken of them,and for the orange tan on there skin it could have be through the extreme cold and part of the gene,s they carried through there past,remember she and the other three had been there for over a mouth in the eliments,l will write more in the near future,but now four of them was murdered,and the rest froze to death as part of the murders,simple l,ve studied this mystery for a year now,l was being put of with other ideas,some of the clues is the tent and then the foot prints then making of the fire,which in the dark you would be giving yourself away with the light of the fire,plus the four bodys at the end in the wood suffered trumatic deaths.

  2. Excuse me for the poor english . For Dyatlov case it is possible explain it with a little supposition : A U.F.O stand up over them for a very long time i mean one hour and may be over ! I am not able explain in english only in french . Excuse me again.

    1. Almost all the clues go in the direction of U.F.O and the deduction of Lev Ivanov the head of investigation in 1959 . My inductions go in this way too . Deduction and induction make a powerful history but scientists are programmed to deny so they are a sect led by diktats !! Proof ? Economy is money and science is hypothesis + verification and confirmation . This is the official way to proceed but scientists make an exception pour the U.F.O case .
      ( On Google do : Alain Valade Dyatlov = 4 sites and about 20 e-mails .
      Post-scriptum : Dead Science is a sect and at the opposite Living Science is not sick !………This case is an ILLUSION since 1959 and Dead Science make us turn around .

  3. Do you want proof of foolishness of scientists who deny U.F.O ? To have a Nobel prize a team of scientists must have a convicing result and this one must be confirmed by another team wich has no connection with it and wich reaches the same result . It is considered like a proof !
    However , if 3 or 4 people distant between them describe a U.F.O in the same way and they do not know each other at all ….it is not good !!!!! This only example proves not only the foolishness of this science but ours too because we follow it !!

  4. Sill a slap ? Science is withdrawing into a tower with his good named CERTITUDE but when a certainty falls as it has so often happened then one realizes that it was a belief…….so we were part of a sect !! Only the reaserchers are freed ,open and go to what explains on the basis of common sense and promise and not that which is framed to be deified . To conclude : It is a quote from the philosopher Alain ( 1868-1951 ) :: DOUBT is not below science but above because it is the sign of certainty . CERTITUDE is the good of Dead Science while DOUBT is the one of reasearch ( Living science ) wich is true science .
    My last e-mail .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: